空腔耗能剪力墙力学性能研究

doi:10.11917/j.issn.1673-4807.2020.04.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了降低结构自重并提高普通剪力墙的抗震性能,提出一种在普通剪力墙墙体中部开设贯通空腔并配置斜向耗能钢筋的空腔耗能剪力墙.使用有限元软件ABAQUS对空腔耗能剪力墙、空腔剪力墙和普通配筋剪力墙进行单调和往复加载数值模拟,对比分析3种剪力墙的力学性能.此外,在理论分析的基础上,提出空腔耗能剪力墙的水平极限承载力估算公式,并利用数值模拟的结果对其有效性进行验证.研究表明,与普通剪力墙相比,开设空腔能够改善剪力墙墙体的延性性能,但降低了剪力墙的刚度和承载力;空腔耗能剪力墙的位移延性系数较相同尺寸空腔剪力墙提高10%,耗能能力提高达1倍以上.空腔耗能剪力墙的水平极限承载力理论分析结果与模拟结果的误差在10%以内,可以满足实际工程的估算要求.

关键词: 空腔耗能剪力墙, 水平承载力, 延性, 耗能能力, 滞回性能

Abstract:

In order to reduce the structure weight and improve the seismic performance of conventional shear walls, a novel cavity energy dissipation shear wall was proposed, which was a shear wall with through cavity and oblique energy dissipation reinforcements arranged inside. Firstly, cavity energy dissipation shear wall, cavity shear wall and conventional reinforced shear wall were tested under static loadings and reserved loadings using finite element software ABAQUS. Then, comparative analysis of the three types of shear walls was carried out. Finally, the equations for estimating the horizontal ultimate bearing capacity of cavity energy dissipation shear wall were proposed based on the theoretical analysis. The research results indicate that, setting a cavity in the shear wall could improve the structural ductility performance of the shear wall. Compared with the conventional shear wall, the displacement ductility ratio of cavity energy dissipation shear wall could improve by 10%, and energy dissipation capacity of cavity energy dissipation shear wall was two times larger than those of the conventional shear wall. The errors between the theoretical and simulation results of the horizontal ultimate bearing capacity of cavity energy dissipation shear walls are within 10%, which could meet the requirement of engineering estimation.

Key words: cavity energy dissipation shear wall, horizontal bearing capacity, ductility, energy dissipation capacity, hysteretic behavior

中图分类号:

TU375

高尚信,王维,裴星洙. 空腔耗能剪力墙力学性能研究[J]. 江苏科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 34(4): 111-118.

GAO Shangxin,WANG Wei,PEI Xingzhu. Study on mechanical properties of cavity energy dissipation shear walls[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology( Natural Science Edition), 2020, 34(4): 111-118.

图/表 20

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

图7

图8

表2

图9

图10

图11

图12

表3

图13

图14

表4

图15

表5

参考文献 13

[1]	初明进, 刘继良, 崔会趁, 等. 不同构造竖缝的装配式空心模板剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2014,35(1):93-102.DOI: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2014.01.013.
	CHU Mingjin, LIU Jiliang, CUI Huichen, et al. Experimental study on seismic behaviors of assembled monolithic concrete shear walls built with precast two-way hollow slabs with various details[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2014,35(1):93-102.DOI: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2014.01.013.(in Chinese)
[2]	CRISAFULLI F J, RESTREPO J I. Ductile steel connections for seismic resistant precast buildings[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2003,7(4):541-553.DOI: 10.1080/13632460309350463.
[3]	王维, 王星星, 王冬梅, 等. 直接基于位移的橡胶支座基础隔震剪力墙结构设计方法[J]. 江苏科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,32(4):609-616. DOI: 10.11917/j.issn.1673-4807.2018.04.026.
	WANG Wei, WANG Xingxing, WANG Dongmei, et al. Direct displacement-based design of rubber isolator base-isolated RC shear wall structures[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2018,32(4):609-616. DOI: 10.11917/j.issn.1673-4807.2018.04.026.(in Chinese)
[4]	OTANI S. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete building structures[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1980,7(2):333-334.DOI: 10.1139/180-041. doi: 10.1139/l80-041
[5]	AJRAB J J, PEKCAN G, MANDER J B. Rocking wall-frame structures with supplemental tendon systems[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004,130:895-903. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(895). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(895)
[6]	SALONIKIOS T N. Shear strength and deformation patterns of R/C walls with aspect ratio 1.0 and 1.5 designed to Eurocode 8 (EC8)[J]. Engineering Structures, 2002,24(1):39-49.DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00076-1. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00076-1
[7]	王琼梅, 王刚, 许淑芳. 空心剪力墙结构抗震性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010,43(S2):182-186.DOI: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2010.S2.041.
	WANG Qiongmei, WANG Gang, XU Shufang. An experimental study on the seismic behavior of hollow RC shear wall model building[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010,43(S2):182-186.DOI: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2010.S2.041.(in Chinese)
[8]	徐刚, 李爱群. 空腔剪力墙受力机理的理论与数值分析[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,47(5):987-992. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.05.023.
	XU Gang, LI Aiqun. Theoretical and numerical analysis on stress mechanism of cavity shear wall[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2017,47(5):987-992. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.05.023.(in Chinese)
[9]	彭占关, 秦鹏, 谈忠坤. 钢筋混凝土空心剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2018,48(6):5-11.DOI: 10.19701/j.jzjg.2018.06.002.
	PENG Zhanguan, QIN Peng, TAN Zhongkun. Experimental study on seismic performance of hollow reinforcement concrete shear wall[J]. Building Structure, 2018,48(6):5-11.DOI: 10.19701/j.jzjg.2018.06.002.(in Chinese)
[10]	李宏男, 王黎明, 马荣全, 等. 预制保温带暗斜撑钢筋混凝土剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2018,39(9):38-44. DOI: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2018.09.005.
	LI Hongnan, WANG Liming, MA Rongquan, et al. Experimental study on seismic behavior of precast insulation shear walls with diagonal bracing[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2018,39(9):38-44. DOI: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2018.09.005.(in Chinese)
[11]	张锡治, 韩鹏, 李义龙, 等. 带现浇暗柱齿槽式预制钢筋混凝土剪力墙抗震性能试验[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2014,35(8):88-94.DOI: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2014.08.034.
	ZHANG Xizhi, HAN Peng, LI Yilong, et al. Seismic behavior of prefabricated alveolar type RC shear walls with cast-in-place embedded columns[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2014,35(8):88-94.DOI: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2014.08.034.(in Chinese)
[12]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB 50010-2010 混凝土结构设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010: 209-214.
[13]	方自虎, 甄翌, 李向鹏. 钢筋混凝土结构的钢筋滞回模型[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2018,51(7):613-619.DOI: 10.14188/j.1671-8844.2018-07-008.
	FANG Zihu, ZHEN Yi, LI Xiangpeng. Steel hysteretic model of reinforced concrete structres[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2018,51(7):613-619.DOI: 10.14188/j.1671-8844.2018-07-008.(in Chinese)

CW-1	试验曲线	模拟曲线	误差/%
F_y/kN	333.24	344.20	3.29
Δ_y/mm	10.35	8.88	-14.20
F_p/kN	433.55	402.36	-7.19
Δ_p/mm	28.15	30.89	9.73
Δ_u/mm	60.63	58.32	-3.81
μ	5.86	6.57	12.12

模型编号	SW1	SW2	SW3	SW4	SW5
F_y/kN	368	354	286	293	270
Δ_y/mm	8.2	8.1	6.8	6.3	6.7
F_p/kN	413	399	341	347	308
Δ_u/mm	57.5	63.9	57.2	59.2	52.8
μ	7.0	7.9	8.4	9.4	7.9

模型编号	SW1	SW4	XSW1	XSW2
F_y/kN	368	293	309	311
Δ_y/mm	8.2	6.3	8.5	8.2
F_p/kN	413	347	373	377
Δ_u/mm	57.5	59.2	85.7	84.4
μ	7.0	9.4	10.1	10.3

项目	SW1	SW4	XSW1	XSW2
模拟值/kN	413	347	373	377
计算值/kN	397	381	394	412
误差/%	-3.9	9.8	5.6	9.3